OBC software comparison
CleanLog vs GoAudits: Inspection platform or cleaning-contract scorecard?
Compare CleanLog and GoAudits on cleaning inspections, OBC scorecards, reporting, support, and qualified per-user pricing.
By CleanLog Team · Facts checked 6 August 2026
Our verdict
Choose CleanLog for the contract score.
CleanLog joins inspections, attendance, work orders, response times, and IoT inputs in one weighted score and signed report, with unlimited users. GoAudits goes deeper on the inspection itself: it is built for audits as the whole job, not audits as one input to a contract score.
When GoAudits is better: GoAudits is the better fit when audits are the whole job: inspections that stand on their own, with no contract score or signed monthly report behind them.
An inspection score is not the same thing as a contract score. GoAudits is built around the audit. The test is month end, when attendance, response times, and sensor readings have to land in the same weighted number your contract defines, and both parties have to sign it.
What does one OBC contract cost?
One Singapore cleaning contract, one location, unlimited CleanLog users, a monthly KPI report, and client sign-off.
- CleanLog · Operations & Evidence + OBC Compliance
- S$388/month · First year: S$4,656, setup included. Unlimited users.
- GoAudits · Starter
- $10/user/month · Per user under annual billing. First year: From $120 per user. No setup price published. Confirm the reporting tier required. Displayed $ currency is unnamed; confirm currency, tax, annual term, and final user count.
- GoAudits · Enterprise
- $30/user/month · Per user under annual billing. First year: From $360 per user. No setup price published. Advanced consolidated reporting and trends. Displayed $ currency is unnamed; confirm currency, tax, annual term, and final user count.
Bottom line: GoAudits' total scales with headcount under annual billing; CleanLog's price does not. Count everyone who will open the app, then ask GoAudits for the all-in annual figure for that headcount at the reporting tier you need.
The structural difference is how the price scales. GoAudits charges per user; CleanLog does not. Count everyone who will open the app in a month: cleaners logging attendance, supervisors running inspections, client representatives checking the score. That headcount, priced over the annual term, is the real comparison. On capability, CleanLog combines inspections with attendance, work orders, response times, and IoT inputs to score the contract; GoAudits stays inside the inspection.
Does it meet the OBC requirements?
What each vendor's checked pages document, row by row. A dash names the nearest capability the vendor's page documents. "Not published" does not mean no; it means the page we checked does not document it, so ask in the demo.
| OBC requirement | CleanLog | GoAudits |
|---|---|---|
| Electronic audits with photo evidence | Yes | Yes |
| Work orders with SLA tracking | Yes | Corrective actions |
| Form submissions: toolbox meetings, safety records | Yes | Not published |
| Attendance, work orders, and sensors count in the score | Yes | Not published |
| A weighted score from the contract's KPIs | Yes | Not published |
| One collated report for the whole contract: inspections, work orders, SLAs, safety | Yes | Not published |
| Client sign-off on the monthly report | Yes | Not published |
| Signed report locked against edits | Yes | Not published |
| Accounts for the whole site crew | Yes | Priced per user |
What support is promised?
This section compares published commitments, not the quality of either support team.
CleanLog
- Standard email support and initial setup are included; Priority Success publishes a four-business-hour first-response target during Singapore business hours.
GoAudits
- GoAudits advertises a 14-day trial and 24/7 support. Confirm the support channel and response commitment for the selected plan.
Common questions
Does GoAudits work offline?
Yes. Its cleaning product page documents mobile and offline audits.
Does GoAudits only handle individual inspections?
No. It also has dashboards, consolidated reports, trends, corrective actions, scheduling, and multi-location use. CleanLog covers corrective actions, consolidated reporting, and trends too; the difference is that CleanLog rolls them into one contract score and signed report.
Does GoAudits offer a trial and support?
It advertises a 14-day free trial and 24/7 support. Confirm the channel and response time for your plan.
What should we ask for in a GoAudits demo?
Bring your contract's KPI schedule. Ask GoAudits to build the weighted contract score from an inspection plus records that are not inspections, such as attendance or response times. Then ask to see both parties sign one monthly report, and what locks after signing.
How we checked this
We used public official and regulatory sources. We did not use customer reports, private product-owner experience, or unsupported service-quality ratings.
Official · High confidence
GoAudits documents mobile and offline audits, cleaning checklists, photos, scores, reports, corrective actions, dashboards, scheduling, and multi-location use.Accessed 2026-08-06 · reviewed 2026-08-06 · review by 2026-11-05
Official · High confidence
GoAudits publishes per-user prices under annual billing, plan reporting scope, a 14-day trial, 24/7 support, consolidated reporting, and trend capability; the displayed dollar currency is unnamed.Accessed 2026-08-06 · reviewed 2026-08-06 · review by 2026-11-05
Official · High confidence
CleanLog Operations & Evidence and OBC Compliance pricing, setup, unlimited-user model, and support commitments.Accessed 2026-08-06 · reviewed 2026-08-06 · review by 2026-11-05
Official · High confidence
CleanLog evidence lineage, work orders with SLA clocks, toolbox and safety records, contract-configured KPI weights, bilateral report sign-off, and version locking.Accessed 2026-08-06 · reviewed 2026-08-06 · review by 2026-11-05
Regulatory · High confidence
Advisory guidance on electronic audits, score calculation, buyer sign-off, edit protection, and payment context.Accessed 2026-08-06 · reviewed 2026-08-06 · review by 2026-11-05